Rapamycin.store Longevity & healthspan · evidence-first

Contact

Contact us

Corrections first, questions about the evidence second. A person reads every message, and we reply within two business days.

By The Rapamycin.store Research Desk Last updated We welcome corrections
Write to the desk
Every message is read by a person. Reported errors are checked against the source. We cannot answer personal medical questions.

Send us a message

Corrections first, questions about the evidence second. Fields marked * are required. A person reads every message and replies within two business days.

The fastest way to reach the desk is email: [email protected]. Everything sent to that address is read by a person, and the form above routes to the same inbox with the details we need already attached.

Found an error? Tell us, this is the message we most want

Accuracy is the entire product here, so a correction is more useful to us than almost anything else you could send. A report we can act on quickly usually has three things in it:

  • The page URL and, if you can, the sentence. A quoted phrase lets us find the claim without guessing which of several statements you mean.
  • What is wrong. A misread study, an outdated figure, a dose stated in the wrong units, a citation that does not support the claim attached to it. The category helps us judge urgency.
  • The source that shows what is right. A PubMed ID, DOI or link to the primary literature. We will read it.

What happens next: we verify against the primary source rather than taking either side on trust. Either way you get an answer.

  • If the claim was wrong, we change it, note the change, and update the page's last-reviewed date.
  • If the claim was right, we write back with the citation and tell you why we think so.

The full policy is on our editorial standards page, and the rapamycin evidence review shows what a graded, cited page looks like. About the desk explains who reads what you send.

What happens to a correction you send
What happens to a correction you send Three boxes in a row: you send the page, the sentence and a source; the desk checks the primary source; the page is corrected and dated, or you get the citation that supports it. 1. You send page, sentence, source 2. We check against the primary source 3. You hear back fixed and dated, or cited
Every correction takes the same three steps, and you hear back at the end of the third whichever way it goes. Sources: Rapamycin.store editorial standards, corrections policy

What we cannot answer

Sponsorship inquiries have their own terms on the advertising page. Two kinds of message arrive regularly that we have to decline, and it is fairer to say so here than to leave you waiting on a reply.

  • Personal medical questions. We are not clinicians and we do not have your history, your medications or your bloodwork. We cannot tell you whether a compound is safe for you, what dose to take, or whether to stop something you have been prescribed. Those are questions for a licensed clinician who can examine you; see our medical disclaimer.
  • Where to buy prescription drugs without a prescription. We do not know, we would not say, and we do not link to grey-market vendors. Where legitimate routes exist we describe them openly, as on rapamycin cost and access.

Reply times, and what to expect

We aim to reply within two business days, in this order:

  • Corrections get looked at first, because a wrong claim sitting live is the one problem that compounds.
  • Reader questions about the evidence on a page, such as why we graded a trial the way we did, are usually answered in the same window.

Commercial enquiries are handled separately. Advertising, sponsored articles and link placements have their own terms, rates and editorial rules, and they are all set out on the write for us and sponsored posts page. Sending a commercial enquiry through this form will work, but you will get a faster and more complete answer by starting there.

A correction is the strongest signal we get. It goes to the front of the queue.

References

4 sources, all link-checked; oldest check

  1. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Guyatt GH et al. BMJ 2008;336:924.The framework behind the strong / mixed / limited evidence grades used across this site.Verified Sep 15, 2026
  2. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, updated 2025.The conflict-of-interest and authorship conventions this desk follows for a lay publication.Verified Sep 15, 2026
  3. PubMed. US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.The index every citation on this site is checked against before publication.Verified Sep 15, 2026
  4. The FTC's Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking. US Federal Trade Commission business guidance, on 16 CFR Part 255.The rule requiring clear and conspicuous disclosure of material connections, including affiliate commissions.Verified Sep 15, 2026

Every link above is re-requested on a schedule by an automated checker; the date shown is when it last answered. Publishers that block automated requests are marked as such rather than reported broken. Our editorial standards explain how a source gets cited here in the first place.

Filed by the Rapamycin.store evidence desk. Each source is re-checked when the page is reviewed.